Fetal Growth Restriction + Absent End-Diastolic Flow (Umbilical Artery) at
35 weeks
1
/
12
One point / slide
←
→
Space
Home
End
FGR +
AEDV
at 35 weeks
Clinical approach to late-preterm FGR with absent umbilical artery end-diastolic velocity (placental insufficiency phenotype).
Audience:
OB residents / fellows / MFM
Scope:
screening → diagnosis → management
Teaching point
At
35 weeks
, persistent
AEDV
usually crosses the threshold for
delivery planning now
, not prolonged expectant management.
Why it matters
High placental resistance → fetal hypoxemia risk
Stillbirth risk rises as Dopplers worsen
Labor tolerance may be limited
Define the problem
Confirm you are managing
FGR
(not constitutionally small)
plus
pathologic placental Doppler.
Diagnosis frame
EFW or AC
<10th percentile
(severe:
<3rd
)
Umbilical artery:
absent end-diastolic flow
Exclude anomalies / infection when indicated
Common pitfalls
Dating error → mislabeling FGR
Single Doppler sample → repeat for persistence
Mixing “SGA” with “FGR” in counseling
Pathophysiology
AEDV reflects
marked
placental vascular resistance and reduced fetoplacental perfusion.
Concept chain
Abnormal placentation → high resistance villous bed
↓ Diastolic flow → ↓ oxygen delivery reserve
Progression risk: AEDV → REDV → acidemia
Clinical meaning
Not “small only.” It is a hemodynamic signal of compromised placental function.
Umbilical artery waveform (schematic)
Baseline
AEDV
Peak systolic present
Diastolic flow = 0
Higher risk phenotype
vs elevated PI alone
Risk factors to surface (fast)
Risk stratification helps anticipate maternal disease and neonatal course.
Maternal
Chronic HTN / preeclampsia
Renal / autoimmune disease
Smoking, substance exposure
Placental / pregnancy
Abnormal placentation
Multiple gestation
Prior FGR / stillbirth
Fetal
Aneuploidy / anomalies
Infection (when suspected)
Severe oligohydramnios
Immediate confirmation at 35 weeks
Before action: confirm persistence, fetal status, and competing indications for expedited delivery.
Do now
Repeat UA Doppler (confirm
persistent
AEDV)
BPP or NST + AFI/SDP
Maternal evaluation: BP, symptoms, labs if indicated
Interpretation
Nonreassuring testing
→ deliver urgently
Reassuring testing still ≠ “safe for weeks”
Document dating + growth trajectory
Uncertainty flag
Intermittent vs persistent AEDV may differ in risk; manage conservatively when uncertain.
Delivery timing: where 35 weeks fits
Evidence-based guidance generally recommends
earlier
delivery for AEDV than 35 weeks.
Guideline anchor (concept)
AEDV typically triggers delivery around
33–34 weeks
REDV earlier (often
30–32 weeks
)
At 35 weeks: balance shifts toward
delivery now
Risk tradeoff at 35 weeks
Placental failure risk persists (stillbirth/acidemia)
Late-preterm neonatal risks are real but lower than earlier GA
Goal: minimize exposure time to compromised placenta
Antenatal meds (late preterm)
Use interventions that improve neonatal outcomes
without
delaying indicated delivery.
Consider
Betamethasone
if delivery likely within 7 days and no prior course
Group B strep prophylaxis per status
NICU consult; plan thermoregulation/glucose support
Not routine at 35 weeks
Magnesium neuroprotection
(typically <32 weeks)
Tocolysis to “finish steroids” in a compromised fetus
Prolonged observation if testing deteriorates
Principle
Steroids may be helpful, but fetal status dictates urgency.
Mode of delivery: decision framework
AEDV increases risk of intrapartum compromise; route should be individualized.
Favors induction
Reassuring testing; no additional red flags
Favorable cervix; vertex; reasonable EFW
Capacity for
continuous EFM
+ rapid operative delivery
Favors cesarean
Nonreassuring NST/BPP, recurrent decelerations
Severe growth restriction + poor reserve
Unfavorable cervix with high likelihood of prolonged labor
Communicate clearly
“Higher chance of urgent cesarean during labor” should be explicit in counseling.
If delivery is not immediate (rare)
Only if testing is reassuring and a brief, protocolized window is clinically justified.
Minimum surveillance
Inpatient or very close monitoring
Frequent NST/CTG; repeat UA Doppler
Low threshold to deliver with any deterioration
Triggers to deliver now
Reversed
UA flow or worsening Dopplers
Abnormal CTG / BPP, oligohydramnios worsening
Maternal indication (preeclampsia, severe HTN)
Reality check
At 35 weeks with persistent AEDV, extended expectant management is usually not favored.
Intrapartum priorities
Assume limited reserve; plan for rapid response to evolving fetal acidemia.
Monitoring
Continuous EFM; interpret conservatively
Early attention to recurrent variable/late decels
Prompt escalation: intrauterine resuscitation + decision
Operational readiness
OR availability; anesthesia aware
Neonatal team present at delivery
Avoid prolonged second stage if tracing deteriorates
Key phrase
“Low threshold for operative delivery.”
Neonatal implications at 35 weeks
Counsel on both prematurity and growth restriction effects.
Expected issues
Hypoglycemia risk; feeding support
Thermoregulation challenges
Respiratory morbidity possible (late preterm)
Delivery room plan
NICU/SCN presence; glucose protocol
Delayed cord clamping if stable and feasible
Placenta to pathology (often high yield)
One-slide algorithm (take-home)
For
35 weeks
with
persistent AEDV
in FGR.
Algorithm
Confirm dating + persistent AEDV
Assess fetal status (NST/BPP + fluid)
Plan delivery now
(route individualized)
Consider late-preterm steroids if feasible without unsafe delay
Evidence anchors
SMFM Consult Series #52: FGR + Doppler-based timing
ACOG Practice Bulletin: FGR evaluation and management
Key idea: AEDV indicates high-risk placental insufficiency
This deck is educational; apply local protocols and patient-specific factors.